{"id":10280,"date":"2023-05-30T11:52:52","date_gmt":"2023-05-30T14:52:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ronaldomartins.adv.br\/?p=10280"},"modified":"2023-05-30T11:52:52","modified_gmt":"2023-05-30T14:52:52","slug":"relevant-decisions-in-the-administrative-council-of-tax-appeals-in-the-month-of-august-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ronaldomartins.adv.br\/en\/30\/05\/2023\/relevant-decisions-in-the-administrative-council-of-tax-appeals-in-the-month-of-august-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"RELEVANT DECISIONS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL OF TAX APPEALS IN THE MONTH OF AUGUST\/2022"},"content":{"rendered":"
Although the trial sessions of the Administrative Council of Tax Appeals have not been fully resumed, especially due to the current strike of tax auditors, the Panels of CARF Higher Court of Tax Appeals have reached tax decisions of great relevance to the interests of taxpayers and in many of the judgments there was a change of understandings previously consolidated within the judging bodies of CARF, among which the following stand out:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
It is relevant to note that the benefit of spontaneous denunciation occurs when the taxpayer, after partially acknowledging the tax debt (assessment by approval), presents the proof of full payment of the debt and rectifies the statement before any inspection procedure; that is, the taxpayer reports the difference of the debt along with the presentation of proof of payment. In these cases, the fine for late payment will be 20 percent, not 75 percent.<\/p>\n