{"id":11753,"date":"2024-07-04T11:38:56","date_gmt":"2024-07-04T14:38:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ronaldomartins.adv.br\/?p=11753"},"modified":"2024-07-04T11:38:56","modified_gmt":"2024-07-04T14:38:56","slug":"maintenance-of-tax-relief-for-payroll","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ronaldomartins.adv.br\/en\/04\/07\/2024\/maintenance-of-tax-relief-for-payroll\/","title":{"rendered":"MAINTENANCE OF TAX RELIEF FOR PAYROLL"},"content":{"rendered":"
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX AREA<\/strong><\/p>\n MAINTENANCE OF TAX RELIEF FOR PAYROLL<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Considering the relevance of the issue, we reproduce the decision of Federal Supreme Court Justice Cristiano Zanin, who suspended for 60 days the effects of the preliminary injunction previously granted on April 25 that overturned the payroll tax relief for companies and municipalities, in response to a request from the Federal Attorney General’s Office and the Senate.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Remember that if the bill sent by the government is approved, new provisions will be put in place to re-establish the tax treatment of companies included in the tax relief program.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Therefore, under the terms of the new preliminary injunction issued in ADI (Direct Action for Unconstitutionality) 7633, the tax relief was guaranteed for another 60 (sixty) days, until Senate Bill No. 1847 of 2024 is discussed and deliberated by the Houses of Congress:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n ADI\u00a07633<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Date of Progress: 17\/05\/2024<\/em><\/p>\n Progress: Preliminary injunction granted <\/em>ad referendum<\/p>\n <\/p>\n For more information, contact<\/strong> Fab\u00edola Paes de Almeida Ragazzo, fabiola.ragazzo@ronaldomartins.adv.br<\/strong>, +55 (11) 99968-5948 \/ +55 (11) 3066-4800, lawyer and consultant in the Tax Area of the law firm RONALDO MARTINS & Advogados.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" SOCIAL SECURITY TAX AREA MAINTENANCE OF TAX RELIEF FOR PAYROLL \u00a0 Considering the relevance of the issue, we reproduce the decision of Federal Supreme Court Justice Cristiano Zanin, who suspended for 60 days the effects of the preliminary injunction previously granted on April 25 that overturned the payroll tax relief for companies and municipalities, in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":11008,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11753","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\nNotes: “(…) thus, in order to ensure the possibility of obtaining a solution through inter-institutional dialogue aimed at overcoming the alleged defects present in Law no. 14,784\/2023, I give prospective effect to the decision I rendered on April 25, 2024, so that it takes effect within 60 (sixty) days from the publication of this decision. Once the 60 (sixty) day period has elapsed without a solution, the preliminary injunction granted will resume its full effectiveness, without prejudice to the evidentiary stage and judgment of this concentrated control action and regardless of any new summons.\u00a0\u00a0 Pursuant to art. 21, IV and V, and \u00a7 5, of the Federal Supreme Court’s Internal Rules, and art. 10, preamble and \u00a7 3, of Law No. 9,868\/1999, I order the immediate submission of this decision to the Plenary, in a virtual environment, to be inserted in the agenda of the subsequent or extraordinary session, for judgment of the referendum.”<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n